Better Stack
Better Stack is a structured log management platform based on ClickHouse.
According to our data, Better Stack ranks 32th among the application monitoring tools we track.
It has 0.1% of the application monitoring market share and is detected on 0.004% of all websites.
- π Website
πΈ Pricing
Better Stack is available in both free and paid versions.
π Rankings and Market Share
- Application Monitoring
- Rank: 32
- Market share: 0.1%
π Better Stack Awards
- π₯ 14th most popular in the Netherlands in the Application Monitoring category.
β‘ Sites Using Better Stack
We have data on 170 websites that use the Better Stack application monitoring tool. Here is a list of some of the top ranked ones.
The highest rated site using Better Stack is betterstack.com.
| # | Website | Rank | Country | Language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | #13,814 | Czech Republic | English | |
| 2 | #39,233 | English | ||
| 3 | #54,339 | Switzerland | English | |
| 4 | #59,785 | Switzerland | American English | |
| 5 | #96,312 | Hungary | Hungarian | |
| 6 | #111,013 | France | ||
| 7 | #120,510 | Netherlands | Dutch | |
| 8 | #135,963 | France | ||
| 9 | #170,341 | English | ||
| 10 | #180,179 | Romania | Romanian | |
| 11 | #188,873 | Belgium | Dutch | |
| 12 | #190,014 | Belgium | Dutch | |
| 13 | #217,284 | United Kingdom | English | |
| 14 | #261,924 | English | ||
| 15 | #279,903 | English | ||
| 16 | #282,228 | Spain | Basque | |
| 17 | #333,370 | Norway | Norwegian | |
| 18 | #363,875 | Slovakia | Slovak | |
| 19 | #369,302 | Poland | Polish | |
| 20 | #378,377 | Romania | Romanian |
π Usage Statistics
Most of the sites that use Better Stack:
- are located in the Netherlands
- have content in English
- use the .com domain extension
- fall into the Business category.
Most of the sites using Better Stack are from the Netherlands, the United States, and Germany.
- Netherlands 35.1%
- United States 16.2%
- Germany 8.8%
- Spain 4.1%
- Sweden 4.1%
- United Kingdom 4.1%
- Belgium 2.7%
- Czech Republic 2.7%
- France 2%
- Other 20.2%
Most Better Stack users speak English, Dutch, or Polish.
- English 47.9%
- Dutch 29.7%
- Polish 5.5%
- German 2.4%
- Danish 1.8%
- Basque 1.8%
- Spanish 1.2%
- Italian 1.2%
- Czech 1.2%
- Other 7.3%
The Better Stack application monitoring tool is especially popular on .com, .nl, and .io top-level domains.
- .com 27.6%
- .nl 24.1%
- .io 7.1%
- .de 2.4%
- .ai 2.4%
- .es 1.8%
- .it 1.8%
- .be 1.8%
- .co.uk 1.8%
- Other 29.2%
The primary market segments for websites utilizing Better Stack include business, fashion and beauty, and Internet services.
- Business 23.1%
- Fashion/Beauty 19.2%
- Internet Services 11.5%
- Marketing/Merchandising 11.5%
- Online Shopping 11.5%
- Software/Hardware 11.5%
- Games 3.8%
- Travel 3.8%
- Auctions/Classifieds 3.8%
- Other 0.3%
π΅οΈ Similar Technologies
These are some of the best Better Stack alternatives.
π Compare Alternatives
Compare Better Stack toβ¦
- π΅οΈ Similar tools
- β Market leaders
- π‘ More alternatives
- π All options
π¬ Frequently Asked Questions
Where is Better Stack from?
Better Stack is from Prague, Czech Republic.
Does Better Stack offer a free plan?
Yes, there is a free version with limited functionality.
How much does it cost per month?
The pricing for Better Stack starts at $34 per month.
Which country uses Better Stack the most?
The majority of Better Stack users are from the Netherlands.
Who uses Better Stack?
According to our data, Better Stack is used on over a hundred sites, including such established ones as tricentis.com,
givengain.com, and
objkt.com.
What are the alternatives to Better Stack?
Alternatives and possible competitors to Better Stack may include
Datadog, Pingdom, and
UptimeRobot.
ποΈ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

