Zipkin
X Corp., Bastrop, Texas, United StatesZipkin is a distributed tracing system originally developed by Twitter.
According to our data, Zipkin ranks 19th among the application monitoring tools we track.
It has 0.3% of the application monitoring market share and is detected on 0.01% of all websites.
- 🏠 Website
- 🔗 Links
- </> Source code
- 👨👩👦👦 Community
Zipkin User💸 Pricing
Zipkin is available for free.
📊 Rankings and Market Share
- Application Monitoring
- Rank: 19
- Market share: 0.3%
🏆 Zipkin Awards
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Germany in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Spain in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in Australia in the Application Monitoring category.
⚡ Sites Using Zipkin
We have data on 428 websites that use the Zipkin application monitoring tool. Here is a list of some of the top ranked ones.
The highest rated site using Zipkin is netflix.com.
| # | Website | Rank | Country | Language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | #19 | United States | English | |
| 2 |  nytimes.com |
#50 | United States | English |
| 3 | #86 | English | ||
| 4 | #178 | United States | American English | |
| 5 |  itunes.apple.com |
United States | American English | |
| 6 | #359 | English | ||
| 7 | #988 | American English | ||
| 8 | #1,204 | English | ||
| 9 | #1,312 | United States | English | |
| 10 |  vrbo.com |
#1,408 | United States | English |
| 11 | Netherlands | English | ||
| 12 | #2,836 | United States | English | |
| 13 | #3,479 | United States | American English | |
| 14 | #3,868 | United States | English | |
| 15 | #5,441 | Poland | Polish | |
| 16 | #6,051 | Japan | Japanese | |
| 17 | #6,348 | United States | English | |
| 18 | #7,292 | Germany | German | |
| 19 | #7,543 | Poland | Polish | |
| 20 | #8,158 | American English |
📈 Usage Statistics
Most of the sites that use Zipkin:
- are located in Germany
- have content in English
- use the .com domain extension
- fall into the Travel category.
Most of the sites using Zipkin are from Germany, the United States, and Spain.
- Germany 36%
- United States 11.6%
- Spain 6.3%
- Australia 5.8%
- Switzerland 5%
- China 4.8%
- Finland 4.8%
- Poland 3.3%
- Netherlands 2.5%
- Other 19.9%
Most Zipkin users speak English, German, or Spanish.
- English 36%
- German 33.4%
- Spanish 6.4%
- Finnish 4%
- French 3.8%
- Polish 3.1%
- Chinese 3.1%
- Dutch 1.9%
- Italian 1.7%
- Other 6.6%
The Zipkin application monitoring tool is especially popular on .com and .de top-level domains.
- .com 33.4%
- .de 22%
- .ch 4.4%
- .fi 4.4%
- .io 3%
- .pl 3%
- .es 2.6%
- .shop 2.1%
- .fr 1.9%
- Other 23.2%
The primary market segments for websites utilizing Zipkin include travel, online shopping, and marketing and merchandising.
- Travel 17.6%
- Online Shopping 13.8%
- Marketing/Merchandising 9.4%
- General News 7.5%
- Business 5%
- Blogs/Wiki 5%
- Entertainment 4.4%
- Finance/Banking 4.4%
- Software/Hardware 3.8%
- Other 29.1%
🕵️ Similar Technologies
These are some of the best Zipkin alternatives.
Azure Monitor
Datadog🆚 Compare Alternatives
Compare Zipkin to…
- 🕵️ Similar tools
- ⭐ Market leaders
- 💡 More alternatives
- 🔎 All options
Web Vitals
AWS X-Ray
Dynatrace
Pingdom💬 Frequently Asked Questions
What is the company behind Zipkin?
Zipkin is owned by X Corp., headquartered in Bastrop, Texas, United States.
Can I use Zipkin for free?
Yes, it is a free application monitoring tool.
Moreover, it is an open-source solution, and its code is available on 
GitHub.
Which country uses Zipkin the most?
The majority of Zipkin users are from Germany.
Who uses Zipkin?
According to our data, Zipkin is used on hundreds of sites, including such established ones as netflix.com,
nytimes.com, and nature.com.
How does Zipkin stack up against the competition?
Zipkin is a moderately popular application monitoring tool, ranking ahead of 22 other application monitoring tools we track.
What are the alternatives to Zipkin?
Alternatives and possible competitors to Zipkin may include 
Sentry, 
New Relic, and 
Akamai mPulse.
👉 See Also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,690 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.