Cascade CMS

Hannonhill, Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Cascade CMS is a web-based content management system developed by Hannon Hill for higher education websites.

According to our data, Cascade CMS ranks 216th among the content management systems we track.
It has 0.002% of the CMS market share and powers 0.001% of all websites.

💸 Pricing

Cascade CMS is a commercial product priced starting at $20,000.

$20,000+

📊 Rankings and Market Share

🏆 Cascade CMS Awards

⚡ Sites Powered by Cascade CMS

We have data on 31 websites that use the Cascade CMS platform. Here is a list of some of the top ranked ones.

The highest rated site using Cascade CMS is jmu.edu.

#WebsiteRankCountryLanguage
1 jmu.edu #7,840 United States English
2 rowan.edu #9,570 United States English
3 umkc.edu #11,715 United States American English
4 sandiego.edu #12,913 United States English
5 indianapublicmedia.org #20,868 United States English
6 nebraska.edu #37,775 United States English
7 fhsu.edu #47,127 United States English
8 unomaha.edu #50,714 United States English
9 cnu.edu #59,492 United States English
10 southtexascollege.edu #60,518 United States English
11 canyons.edu #63,044 United States English
12 tamuk.edu #63,125 United States English
13 alfred.edu #66,582 United States English
14 indwes.edu #68,273 United States English
15 northeaststate.edu #122,880 United States American English
16 cccd.edu #126,179 United States English
17 gmercyu.edu #143,311 United States English
18 kckcc.edu #161,179 United States English
19 reynolds.edu #166,640 United States English
20 grayson.edu #259,639 United States English

📈 Usage Statistics

Most of the sites that use Cascade CMS:

Most of the sites using Cascade CMS are from the United States and Canada.

  • United States 93.3%
  • Canada 6.7%

Most Cascade CMS users speak English.

  • English 100%

The Cascade CMS platform is especially popular on .edu, .com, and .org top-level domains.

  • .edu 77.4%
  • .com 9.7%
  • .org 6.5%
  • .ca 6.5%

The primary market segments for websites utilizing Cascade CMS include education and reference, business, and marketing and merchandising.

  • Education/Reference 84%
  • Business 4%
  • Marketing/Merchandising 4%
  • General News 4%
  • Software/Hardware 4%

🕵️ Similar Technologies

These are some of the best Cascade CMS alternatives.

RankName
65
Edlio CMS
Glendale, California, United States

A content management system for K-12 schools and districts that is packed with features designed specifically for teachers and school administrators.

$$$
66
Modern Campus
Toronto, Ontario, Canada

A cloud-based content management system designed specifically for higher education institutions.

$$$
130
Terminalfour
Dublin, Ireland

A content management system for higher education.

$15,000+
154
Morweb
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

A CMS platform for schools, healthcare, nonprofits, and associations.

$149+/month
235
LiveWhale CMS
Portland, Oregon, United States

A content management system designed for colleges and universities.

$$$

🆚 Compare Alternatives

Compare Cascade CMS to…

💬 Frequently Asked Questions

What is the company behind Cascade CMS?

Cascade CMS is owned by Hannon Hill Corporation, headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, United States.

Does Cascade CMS offer a free plan?

No, Cascade CMS is a paid solution.

How much does Cascade CMS cost?

The pricing for Cascade CMS starts at $20,000.

Which country uses Cascade CMS the most?

The majority of Cascade CMS users are from the United States.

Who uses Cascade CMS?

According to our data, Cascade CMS is used on at least 31 sites, including such established ones as jmu.edu, rowan.edu, and umkc.edu.

Do academic institutions use Cascade CMS?

Yes. The most notable of these are jmu.edu, rowan.edu, and umkc.edu. In total, we know of 24 academic websites in the United States that use Cascade CMS.

What are the alternatives to Cascade CMS?

Alternatives and possible competitors to Cascade CMS may include Terminalfour, Modern Campus, and Morweb.

👉 See Also

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.