Hygraph
Hygraph, formerly known as GraphCMS, is a 
GraphQL-native, API-first headless content management system.
According to our data, Hygraph ranks 78th among the content management systems we track.
It has 0.02% of the CMS market share and powers 0.009% of all websites.
- 🏠 Website
- 🏷️ Previous name
- GraphCMS
- </> Source code
GitHub💸 Pricing
Hygraph is available in both free and paid versions.
📊 Rankings and Market Share
- CMS
- Rank: 78
- Market share: 0.02%
🏆 Hygraph Awards
- ⬆️ 72nd most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
⚡ Sites Powered by Hygraph
We have data on 359 websites that use the Hygraph CMS platform. Here is a list of some of the top ranked ones.
The highest rated site using Hygraph is dashlane.com.
| # | Website | Rank | Country | Language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | #12,295 | United States | English | |
| 2 | #13,253 | United Kingdom | English | |
| 3 | #14,800 | Germany | German | |
| 4 | #14,811 | Germany | German | |
| 5 | #20,092 | Germany | German | |
| 6 | #21,640 | United States | English | |
| 7 | #28,193 | United Kingdom | English | |
| 8 | #30,283 | Sweden | English | |
| 9 | #36,378 | Hungary | Hungarian | |
| 10 | #41,079 | English | ||
| 11 | #53,312 | United States | American English | |
| 12 | #55,064 | United Kingdom | English | |
| 13 | #55,572 | United States | English | |
| 14 | #59,661 | United States | English | |
| 15 | #59,853 | France | English | |
| 16 | #64,186 | United Kingdom | English | |
| 17 | #64,417 | English | ||
| 18 | #64,892 | United States | English | |
| 19 | #66,921 | United Kingdom | English | |
| 20 | #66,976 | Australia | English |
📈 Usage Statistics
Most of the sites that use Hygraph:
- are located in the United States
- have content in English
- use the .com domain extension
- fall into the Business category.
Most of the sites using Hygraph are from the United States, Germany, and the Netherlands.
- United States 21.9%
- Germany 14.2%
- Netherlands 10.6%
- United Kingdom 9.3%
- Canada 3.3%
- Switzerland 3.3%
- Australia 3%
- Brazil 2.6%
- Sweden 2.6%
- Other 29.2%
Most Hygraph users speak English, German, or Dutch.
- English 59.7%
- German 13.4%
- Dutch 6.2%
- Spanish 2%
- Portuguese 2%
- Italian 1.4%
- French 1.4%
- Swedish 1.4%
- Romanian 0.8%
- Other 11.7%
The Hygraph CMS platform is especially popular on .com, .de, and .nl top-level domains.
- .com 42.3%
- .de 8.6%
- .nl 5%
- .com.au 2.5%
- .ch 2.2%
- .co.uk 2.2%
- .org 1.7%
- .io 1.7%
- .com.br 1.7%
- Other 32.1%
The primary market segments for websites utilizing Hygraph include business, online shopping, and marketing and merchandising.
- Business 22.5%
- Online Shopping 16.7%
- Marketing/Merchandising 13%
- Internet Services 5.1%
- Travel 5.1%
- Software/Hardware 5.1%
- Motor Vehicles 4.3%
- Finance/Banking 3.6%
- Restaurants 2.9%
- Other 21.7%
🕵️ Similar Technologies
These are some of the best Hygraph alternatives.
🆚 Compare Alternatives
Compare Hygraph to…
- 🕵️ Similar platforms
- ⭐ Market leaders
- 💡 More alternatives
- 🔎 All options
💬 Frequently Asked Questions
Where is Hygraph from?
Hygraph is from Berlin, Germany.
Does Hygraph offer a free plan?
Yes, there is a free version with limited functionality.
How much does it cost per month?
Hygraph is priced from $299 per month for the Growth plan.
Which country uses Hygraph the most?
The majority of Hygraph users are from the United States.
Who uses Hygraph?
According to our data, Hygraph is used on hundreds of sites, including such established ones as dashlane.com,
moniepoint.com, and
ihk24.de.
How does Hygraph stack up against its competitors?
Hygraph is a moderately popular CMS platform, ranking ahead of 213 other content management systems we track.
👉 See Also
- ✨ Related technologies
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.