🆚 accessiBe vs. ReachDeck

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Accessibility technology
Accessibility technology

About

accessiBe is a web accessibility solution that uses AI to help websites address accessibility barriers and align with ADA and WCAG standards.

It provides automated scanning and AI-based remediation of common WCAG 2.1 issues, a customizable accessibility interface with pre-built profiles and UI adjustments, support for screen reader optimization and keyboard navigation, and multilingual interfaces.

ReachDeck is a digital inclusion software that provides reading support on websites.

Headquarters

Tel Aviv, Israel
Antrim, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

Website

Pricing

Free version ❌Free 7-day trial
AccessWidget$59+/month
AccessFlow$1,290+/month

Categories

Accessibility › Rank #2
Accessibility › Rank #13
Widgets › Rank #13

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

AccessiBe accessibility technology is 20 times more popular than ReachDeck.
Total websites

Market share

Accessibility

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

accessiBe is more popular in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, while ReachDeck is more popular in Sweden, the Netherlands, and Ireland.
United States
Canada
United Kingdom
Italy
Sweden
Israel
Netherlands
Australia
Germany
Austria

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

accessiBe is more popular than ReachDeck in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Health
Internet Services
Fashion/Beauty
Education/Reference
Real Estate
Finance/Banking
Travel

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#1,206
#1,333
#1,539
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,206
#1,515
#6,021
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.