🆚 Acquia DAM vs. Pimcore
- 📈 Pimcore is three times more popular than Acquia DAM.
- 🌍 Pimcore is more popular in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.
- 🌎 Acquia DAM is more popular in the United States, Australia, and Canada.
Acquia DAM
PimcoreType
About
Acquia DAM is a cloud-based digital asset management (DAM) and product information management (PIM) platform that helps teams manage digital assets, product specifications, and marketing copy.
Pimcore is an open-source enterprise platform that includes PIM, CDP, DAM, DXP/CMS, and digital commerce.
It provides a centralized data model with object inheritance, classification stores for product attributes, automated digital asset transformations, configurable data import and export pipelines, and API-first content delivery through 
GraphQL and REST APIs.
Headquarters
Pricing
(on-premises) $9,900/year
(on-premises) $29,900/year
(platform-as-a-service) $39,900+/year
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the PIM category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the PIM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Austria in the PIM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Austria in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Switzerland in the PIM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the PIM category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Cloudinary
PhotoShelter
Brandfolder
Bynder
Canto
Adobe Experience Manager
Craft
CoreMedia
Storyblok🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,603,678 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.