🆚 Adobe Experience Manager vs. Hands-On CMS
- 📈 Adobe Experience Manager is much more popular than Hands-On CMS.
- 🌍 Adobe Experience Manager is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Adobe Experience Manager is a software solution that's equal part content management system (CMS) and digital asset management (DAM) system.
It includes both headless and hybrid CMS models, enterprise-grade DAM capabilities with AI-powered asset tagging and automatic renditions, cloud-delivered scalability, multilingual and multisite support, and workflow/version control for teams.
HandsOn CMS allows hoteliers to have full control over their site.
Headquarters
San Jose, California, United States
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Pricing
Free version ❌
$50,000+/year
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Adobe Experience Manager CMS is 2,412 times more popular than Hands-On CMS.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Adobe Experience Manager is more popular than Hands-On CMS in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Australia
Italy
Canada
Spain
Switzerland
Belgium
Japan
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Australia in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Canada in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Spain in the DAM category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Adobe Experience Manager is more popular than Hands-On CMS in all market segments.
Business
Finance/Banking
Motor Vehicles
Marketing/Merchandising
Health
Travel
Software/Hardware
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

Hapi