🆚 Adobe Experience Manager vs. K2

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Content management system
Content management system

About

Adobe Experience Manager is a software solution that's equal part content management system (CMS) and digital asset management (DAM) system.

It includes both headless and hybrid CMS models, enterprise-grade DAM capabilities with AI-powered asset tagging and automatic renditions, cloud-delivered scalability, multilingual and multisite support, and workflow/version control for teams.

K2 is a Joomla content management extension that replaces and enhances the default article system.

Headquarters

San Jose, California, United States
Victoria, Mahe, Seychelles

Website

Pricing

Free version ❌
$50,000+/year
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

CMS › Rank #7
CMS › Rank #11
DAM › Rank #2

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Adobe Experience Manager CMS is 1.8 times more popular than K2.
Total websites

Market share

CMS

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Adobe Experience Manager is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom, while K2 is more popular in Italy, Spain, and Greece.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Italy
Spain
Greece
Australia
France
Russia
Canada

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Adobe Experience Manager is more popular among sites focused on business, finance and banking, and marketing and merchandising, while K2 is more commonly used on education and reference, general news, and entertainment sites.
Business
Finance/Banking
Marketing/Merchandising
Motor Vehicles
Health
Travel
Education/Reference
Software/Hardware
Online Shopping
Internet Services

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#9,839
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.