🆚 Adobe PageMill vs. Microsoft FrontPage

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

HTML editor
HTML editor

About

Adobe PageMill is a legacy WYSIWYG HTML editor that was discontinued in favor of GoLive.

Microsoft FrontPage was a WYSIWYG HTML editor and website administration tool that was part of Microsoft Office until it was discontinued in 2003.

It offered drag-and-drop page design, automatic hyperlink management, built-in templates, and integration with Microsoft technologies such as Active Server Pages (ASP) and FrontPage Server Extensions for publishing dynamic content.

Headquarters

San Jose, California, United States
Redmond, Washington, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ❌
$149
Free version ❌
$149

Categories

HTML Editors › Rank #10
HTML Editors › Rank #2
Legacy › Rank #70
Legacy › Rank #22

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Microsoft FrontPage HTML editor is 22 times more popular than Adobe PageMill.
Total websites

Market share

HTML Editors
Legacy

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Microsoft FrontPage is more popular than Adobe PageMill in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Italy
Canada
Netherlands
Japan
Spain
France
Brazil

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Microsoft FrontPage is more popular than Adobe PageMill in all market segments.
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Entertainment
Business
Personal Pages
Travel
Online Shopping
Public Information
Recreation/Hobbies
Internet Services

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#125,454
#149,777
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#36,260
#41,680
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.