🆚 Akamai mPulse vs. Oracle Dynamic Monitoring Service
- 📈 Akamai mPulse is much more popular than Oracle Dynamic Monitoring Service.
- 🌍 Akamai mPulse is more popular in all countries.
Type
About
Akamai mPulse is a real user monitoring (RUM) solution that collects performance and user experience data directly from visitors' browsers to measure how websites and applications behave in real conditions.
It captures over 200 performance and business metrics per session, correlates them with outcomes such as conversions and revenue, provides real-time dashboards and anomaly alerts, and includes features such as Core Web Vitals tracking, third-party resource monitoring, and bot detection.
Oracle Dynamic Monitoring Service (DMS) is a library that enables application and system developers to use a variety of DMS sensors to measure and export customized performance metrics for specific software components.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in China in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Pakistan in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Egypt in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Indonesia in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Korea in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Vietnam in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Spain in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in the United States in the Application Monitoring category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,009 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

Datadog
DebugBear