🆚 Alpine.js vs. Riot

Alpine.js is a minimal JavaScript framework that lets developers add reactive behavior directly in HTML markup using attributes and magic properties without needing a build tool.

It has a small footprint, supports declarative syntax with directives like x-data, x-if, x-show etc., includes global stores for shared state, and works without a virtual DOM.

Riot.js is a lightweight, component-based user interface library that uses custom tags to create reactive user interfaces, functioning as a minimalist alternative to larger frameworks like React or Vue.

It focuses primarily on the view layer and state management, allowing developers to build dynamic applications using a clear, tag-based HTML syntax.

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

• 🥉 Third most popular in Belgium in the Frontend Frameworks category.
• ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the Frontend Frameworks category.
• ⭐ 4th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Frontend Frameworks category.
• ⭐ 4th most popular in Germany in the Frontend Frameworks category.
• ⭐ 4th most popular in the Netherlands in the Frontend Frameworks category.

• ⭐ 10th most popular in Japan in the Frontend Frameworks category.
• ⬆️ 23rd most popular in the United States in the Frontend Frameworks category.
• ⬆️ 165th most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
• ⬆️ 256th most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Compare alternatives

Technologies with similar characteristics.

• Alpine.js vs. React
• Alpine.js vs. Vue.js
• Alpine.js vs. Backbone.js
• Alpine.js vs. AngularJS
• Alpine.js vs. Stimulus

• Riot vs. React
• Riot vs. Vue.js
• Riot vs. Quasar
• Riot vs. Mithril.js
• Riot vs. Preact

• Alpine.js technology profile

• Riot technology profile