🆚 Amadeus Web Solutions vs. RMS Cloud
- 📈 Amadeus Web Solutions is slightly more popular than RMS Cloud.
- 🌎 Amadeus Web Solutions is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.
- 🌍 RMS Cloud is more popular in Australia and New Zealand.
Statistics based on 3.4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Amadeus Web Solutions is a platform for hoteliers to build and manage their website.
RMS Cloud is an Australian cloud-based property management system for hospitality businesses.
Headquarters
Madrid, Spain
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Amadeus Web Solutions CMS is 1.2 times more popular than RMS Cloud.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Amadeus Web Solutions is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada, while RMS Cloud is more popular in Australia and New Zealand.
United States
Australia
United Kingdom
Canada
New Zealand
France
United Arab Emirates
Turkey
Malaysia
Spain
Awards
- ⬆️ 84th most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Australia in the Hotel Booking category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in the United States in the Hotel Booking category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in Australia in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 90th most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Amadeus Web Solutions is more popular among sites focused on travel, while RMS Cloud is more commonly used on restaurants and recreation and hobbies sites.
Travel
Restaurants
Marketing/Merchandising
Recreation/Hobbies
Entertainment
Sports
Business
Public Information
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Hapi