🆚 Amazon Web Services vs. Google App Engine

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Cloud service
Cloud service

About

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud computing platform that includes infrastructure as a service (IaaS) and platform as a service (PaaS) offerings.
Google App Engine is a cloud-based platform-as-a-service (PaaS) for developing and hosting web applications in Google-managed data centers.

Headquarters

Seattle, Washington, United States
Mountain View, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free tier ✔️12 Months Free: 750H of EC2 compute + 5GB of S3 storage + 50 GB Elastic Container Registry + 750H of Elastic Load Balancing per month;
Always Free: 1M of AWS Lambda requests + 25 GB of Amazon DynamoDB storage

Categories

Cloud Services › Rank #1
Cloud Services › Rank #8

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

Amazon Web Services technology is 26 times more popular than Google App Engine.
Total websites

Market share

Cloud Services

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Amazon Web Services is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan, while Google App Engine is more popular in Belarus.
United States
United Kingdom
Japan
Canada
Germany
Australia
Brazil
Netherlands
France
India

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Amazon Web Services is more popular than Google App Engine in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki
Travel
Software/Hardware
Health

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#15
Name
Rank
#193
cam4.com
#232

Compare alternatives

Technologies with similar characteristics.

See also

Data updated

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

When interpreting and using the results, please read our methodology and disclaimer.