🆚 Angie vs. Caddy

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Web server
Web server

About

Angie is an efficient web server that was forked from Nginx by its former developers.

Caddy is an open-source multi-platform web server written in Go with built-in support for automatic HTTPS and modern web protocols.

It supports automatic TLS management with providers such as Let's Encrypt and ZeroSSL, includes a built-in reverse proxy with load balancing, offers configuration through the human-readable Caddyfile or a JSON-based REST API, and features a modular architecture that can be extended with plugins.

Headquarters

Moscow, Russia
Vienna, Austria

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️Open source
Angie ProOn request
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Web Servers › Rank #17
Web Servers › Rank #7

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Caddy web server is 14 times more popular than Angie.
Total websites

Market share

Web Servers

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Caddy is more popular in Germany, the United States, and the Netherlands, while Angie is more popular in Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan.
Germany
United States
Russia
Netherlands
France
United Kingdom
Sweden
Spain
Belgium
Romania

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Caddy is more popular than Angie in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Travel
General News
Sports

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
p**npics.com
#750
#3,099
#3,188
p**npics.de
#4,581
View more ➝
Name
Rank
x*x.com
#2,428
#2,826
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.