🆚 Animista vs. Stylelint
- 📈 Stylelint is much more popular than Animista.
- 🌎 Stylelint is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Animista is more popular in Saudi Arabia and the Cayman Islands.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Animista
StylelintType
CSS tool
CSS tool
About
Animista is a web-based 
CSS animation tool and library where developers and designers can generate and test custom CSS keyframe animations.
Stylelint is an open-source CSS linter built on 
PostCSS that helps developers detect errors and enforce consistent coding conventions in CSS, 
Sass, and Less stylesheets.
It includes more than 100 built-in rules, automatically fixes many issues, and supports custom rules, plugins, and shareable configurations.
Headquarters
Croatia
Pricing
Free ✔️
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Stylelint CSS tool is 13 times more popular than Animista.
Total websites
Market share
CSS Tools
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Stylelint is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom, while Animista is more popular in Saudi Arabia and the Cayman Islands.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Spain
France
Canada
Italy
Australia
Ukraine
Netherlands
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Ukraine in the Static Code Analysis category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Static Code Analysis category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Germany in the Static Code Analysis category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Spain in the Static Code Analysis category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in France in the Static Code Analysis category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Stylelint is more popular than Animista in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Travel
Entertainment
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,816,780 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.