🆚 Anura vs. ClickCease
- 📈 ClickCease is much more popular than Anura.
- 🌎 ClickCease is more popular in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Anura is more popular in Turkey.
Type
About
Anura is an ad fraud solution designed to improve campaign performance by accurately identifying bots, malware, and human fraud.
It claims 99.999% accuracy when marking visitors as fraudulent, offers a TAG-Certified Against Fraud seal, and provides real-time detection with both JavaScript-based and API-based integrations.
ClickCease is an ad fraud prevention platform that protects paid advertising campaigns by detecting and blocking invalid clicks, impressions, and bot traffic across major networks such as Google, Meta, and Microsoft Ads.
It uses real-time analysis with over 2,000 behavior tests per visit, automatic IP and audience exclusion lists, customizable filters for geo, VPN and device blocking, detailed analytics including session recordings and fraud heatmaps, competitor click monitoring, and site-level bot mitigation options to reduce wasted spend and improve campaign data quality.
Headquarters
Pricing
(5K visits)$99/month
(10K+ visits)$149+/month
(50K+ visits)$349+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Turkey in the Fraud Prevention category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Israel in the Fraud Prevention category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Fraud Prevention category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Fraud Prevention category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Canada in the Fraud Prevention category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Ukraine in the Fraud Prevention category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,511,216 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
CHEQ
Lunio
Clixtell