🆚 Apache Wicket vs. ASP.NET

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Backend framework
Backend framework

About

Apache Wicket is a component-oriented backend framework for Java that enables developers to build dynamic web applications using pure Java and HTML.

It supports reusable components, AJAX functionality, session management, CSRF protection, and integration with authentication libraries such as Shiro and Spring Security.

Microsoft ASP.NET is a server-side web application framework that runs on the .NET platform and enables developers to build dynamic websites and APIs using languages like C#.

It offers Web Forms, MVC, Web Pages, Web API, and SignalR for real-time communication, includes tools for authentication, state management, and supports the Razor template syntax for combining HTML and server-side code.

Headquarters

Wilmington, Delaware, United States
Redmond, Washington, United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Backend Frameworks › Rank #31
Backend Frameworks › Rank #1

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The ASP.NET backend framework is 559 times more popular than Apache Wicket.
Total websites

Market share

Backend Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

ASP.NET is more popular than Apache Wicket in all countries.
United States
China
United Kingdom
Italy
Turkey
India
Netherlands
Canada
Australia
Germany

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

ASP.NET is more popular than Apache Wicket in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Sports
Health
Travel
Internet Services
Finance/Banking
Software/Hardware

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#1,047
#1,070
#3,487
#13,454
View more ➝
Name
Rank
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.