🆚 ARES vs. Varnish
- 📈 Varnish is much more popular than ARES.
- 🌍 Varnish is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
ARESType
Caching
Caching
About
Pagely ARES is an application gateway for 
WordPress that provides routing and caching.
Varnish Cache is an open-source web application accelerator, also known as a caching HTTP reverse proxy.
Headquarters
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Stockholm, Sweden
Pricing
Free ✔️Included with Pagefly hosting packages
Free version ✔️Open source
Varnish Pro$1,500+/year
Varnish EnterpriseCustom
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Varnish caching is 85 times more popular than ARES.
Total websites
Market share
Caching
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Varnish is more popular than ARES in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
France
Germany
Denmark
Sweden
Netherlands
Norway
Italy
Belgium
Awards
- 🔥 18th most popular in Australia in the Caching category.
- 🔥 19th most popular in the United States in the Caching category.
- 🔥 20th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Caching category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Denmark in the Load Balancers category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Varnish is more popular than ARES in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
General News
Blogs/Wiki
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Marketing/Merchandising
Sports
Internet Services
Travel
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
LiteSpeed Cache
WP Super Cache
Nginx
Envoy
Apache Traffic Server
GoDaddy company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.