🆚 Aruba HiSpeed Cache vs. WP Fastest Cache
- 📈 WP Fastest Cache is much more popular than Aruba HiSpeed Cache.
- 🌎 WP Fastest Cache is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Spain.
- 🌍 Aruba HiSpeed Cache is more popular in Italy.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Caching
Caching
About
HiSpeed Cache is a caching service provided by the Italian hosting platform Aruba for its customers.
WP Fastest Cache is a caching plugin that speeds up 
WordPress sites and improves the PageSpeed Insights score.
Headquarters
Ponte San Pietro, Bergamo, Italy
Ankara, Turkey
Pricing
Free ✔️Included with Aruba hosting packages
Free version ✔️Open source
Premium$49
Categories
Caching › Rank #18
Caching › Rank #7
Performance Optimization › Rank #10
WordPress Plugins › Rank #22
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The WP Fastest Cache caching is 10 times more popular than Aruba HiSpeed Cache.
Total websites
Market share
Caching
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
WP Fastest Cache is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Spain, while Aruba HiSpeed Cache is more popular in Italy.
Italy
United States
Germany
Spain
Japan
France
United Kingdom
Brazil
Netherlands
Australia
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Italy in the Caching category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in the Czech Republic in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Cote D'Ivoire in the Caching category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Germany in the Caching category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Austria in the Caching category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Slovenia in the Caching category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
WP Fastest Cache is more popular than Aruba HiSpeed Cache in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Travel
Entertainment
Online Shopping
General News
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
LiteSpeed Cache
WP Super Cache🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.