🆚 Atropos vs. Lenis
- 📈 Lenis is much more popular than Atropos.
- 🌍 Lenis is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Atropos is particularly popular in Germany.
Statistics based on 3.4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Atropos
LenisType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Atropos is a lightweight, free and open-source 
JavaScript library to create stunning touch-friendly 3D parallax hover effects.
Lenis ("smooth" in Latin) is a modern, lightweight, and performant open-source smooth scrolling library with 
WebGL scroll synchronization, parallax effects, and more.
Headquarters
Weston, Florida, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #288
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #158
Animation › Rank #29
Animation › Rank #14
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Lenis JavaScript library is 51 times more popular than Atropos.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Animation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Lenis is more popular than Atropos in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
France
Japan
Italy
India
Netherlands
Brazil
Spain
Awards
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Korea in the Animation category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Brazil in the Animation category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Switzerland in the Animation category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in the United Arab Emirates in the Animation category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Israel in the Animation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Lenis is more popular than Atropos in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Software/Hardware
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Fashion/Beauty
Online Shopping
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Locomotive Scroll
A-Frame
Jarallax🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,431,368 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.