🆚 Auth.js vs. Supabase
Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *- 📈 Supabase is three times more popular than Auth.js.
- 🌎 Supabase is more popular in the United States, China, and France.
- 🌍 Auth.js is more popular in Turkey, Denmark, and Norway.
Type
About
Auth.js is an open-source authentication solution that integrates with Next.js, Nuxt, Qwik, and other modern JavaScript frameworks to handle user sign-in, session management, and access control.
It supports OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect providers, passwordless email authentication, and passkeys via WebAuthn, and can manage sessions using JSON Web Tokens or database adapters for MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and SQLite.
Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service platform based on PostgreSQL.
It provides a hosted Postgres database with RESTful and GraphQL APIs, built-in authentication, secure file storage, support for edge functions written in TypeScript with global deployment, role-based access control, and row-level security.
Headquarters
Pricing
(8 GB per project, 100K MAU)$25+/month
(+ SSO)$599+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 250th most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in China in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Brazil in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in China in the Databases category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in France in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in India in the Authentication category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.