🆚 Autoptimize vs. Cache Enabler
- 📈 Autoptimize is much more popular than Cache Enabler.
- 🌎 Autoptimize is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Japan.
- 🌍 Cache Enabler is more popular in Taiwan.
Statistics based on 3.6M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Performance optimization technology
Caching
About
Headquarters
Lokeren, Belgium
Ermatingen, Switzerland
Pricing
Free version ✔️ Open source
Pro $12.99/month
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Performance Optimization › Rank #8
WordPress Plugins › Rank #19
WordPress Plugins › Rank #70
Caching › Rank #17
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Autoptimize performance optimization technology is 9 times more popular than Cache Enabler.
Total websites
Market share
WordPress Plugins
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Autoptimize is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Japan, while Cache Enabler is more popular in Taiwan.
United States
Germany
Japan
United Kingdom
Spain
France
Italy
Poland
Netherlands
Australia
Awards
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Germany in the Performance Optimization category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Japan in the WordPress Plugins category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Japan in the Performance Optimization category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Spain in the Performance Optimization category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Poland in the Performance Optimization category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in the Czech Republic in the Caching category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Taiwan in the Caching category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Germany in the Caching category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Poland in the Caching category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Austria in the Caching category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Autoptimize is more popular than Cache Enabler in all market segments.
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Travel
Online Shopping
Health
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,629,123 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Autoptimize