🆚 Azure Front Door vs. Imperva

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Content delivery network
Content delivery network

About

Azure Front Door is is a cloud content delivery network service that offers Layer 7 load-balancing capabilities.

The Imperva Content Delivery Network brings content caching, load balancing, and failover so your applications and content are securely delivered across the globe.

Headquarters

Redmond, Washington, United States
San Mateo, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ❌
Standard$35/month
Premium$330/month
Outbound data transfers (first 10TB)$0.083/GB
10–50 TB$0.066/GB
50–150 TB$0.057/GB
Free version ✔️Free 30 days trial
Pro$59
Business$299

Categories

CDN › Rank #12
CDN › Rank #9
Load Balancers › Rank #8

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Imperva CDN is 1.3 times more popular than Azure Front Door.
Total websites

Market share

CDN

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Imperva is more popular in Japan, Spain, and France, while Azure Front Door is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.
United States
United Kingdom
Australia
Japan
Canada
Spain
Germany
Netherlands
France
Italy

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Imperva is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and finance and banking, while Azure Front Door is more commonly used on health, travel, and software and hardware sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Finance/Banking
Sports
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Health
Travel
Government/Military
Software/Hardware

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,156
#1,213
#1,283
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.