🆚 BaseHub vs. Tina CMS
- 📈 Tina CMS is twice as popular as BaseHub.
- 🌍 Tina CMS is more popular in the United Kingdom and Australia.
- 🌎 BaseHub is more popular in the United States.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
BaseHub is an AI-native, cloud-based headless content management system designed for developer-centric workflows and collaborative editing.
It features a block-based data model,
Git-style content versioning with branching, production-ready website templates, and integrations with frameworks such as Next.js, Astro, and
SvelteKit.
Headquarters
Wilmington, Delaware, United States
Neutral Bay, New South Wales, Australia
Pricing
Free version ✔️Personal, 75K API Requests, 25GB storage
Team
(500K API Requests, 500GB storage)$15/user/month
(500K API Requests, 500GB storage)$15/user/month
Unlimited
(5M API Requests, 5TB storage)$350/month
(5M API Requests, 5TB storage)$350/month
Free version ✔️Open source
TinaCloud
Free version ✔️Includes 2 users, 2 roles, and community support
$29+/month
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Tina CMS platform is 2.4 times more popular than BaseHub.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Tina CMS is more popular in the United Kingdom and Australia, while BaseHub is more popular in the United States.
United States
United Kingdom
Australia
Argentina
India
Korea
Lithuania
Spain
Sweden
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Tina CMS is more popular than BaseHub in all market segments.
Business
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Personal Pages
Politics/Opinion
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Sanity