🆚 Batcache vs. LiteSpeed Cache
- 📈 LiteSpeed Cache is much more popular than Batcache.
- 🌎 LiteSpeed Cache is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and India.
- 🌍 Batcache is more popular in Curacao.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Caching
Caching
About
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Requires LiteSpeed Web Server or QUIC.cloud CDN
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The LiteSpeed Cache caching is 15 times more popular than Batcache.
Total websites
Market share
Caching
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
LiteSpeed Cache is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and India, while Batcache is more popular in Curacao.
United States
United Kingdom
India
Brazil
Spain
Australia
Netherlands
Turkey
France
Poland
Awards
- ⭐ 9th most popular in the United States in the Caching category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Turkey in the Caching category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Mexico in the Caching category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Spain in the Caching category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in New Zealand in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in India in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Brazil in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Caching category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
LiteSpeed Cache is more popular than Batcache in all market segments.
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Entertainment
General News
Travel
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
LiteSpeed Cache
WP Super Cache
Cachify