🆚 Beasties vs. Emotion
- 📈 Emotion is five times more popular than Beasties.
- 🌎 Emotion is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Beasties is more popular in Georgia, Moldova, and Jordan.
Beasties
EmotionType
About
Beasties is a plugin that inlines your app's critical 
CSS and lazy-loads the rest. It is a maintained fork of Critters.
Emotion is an open-source CSS-in-JS library for writing and managing styles with 
JavaScript and 
TypeScript that can be used both with 
React and in a framework-agnostic way.
It supports object and template literal syntax, automatic vendor prefixing, source maps, server-side rendering, nested selectors, and theming, and can optimize generated styles through compile-time transformations using its 
Babel integration.
Headquarters
GitHubPricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 20th most popular in Switzerland in the Performance Optimization category.
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in Sweden in the Performance Optimization category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in Germany in the Performance Optimization category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in Poland in the Performance Optimization category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in Ukraine in the Performance Optimization category.
- ⬆️ 45th most popular in Uzbekistan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 48th most popular in Norway in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 57th most popular in Korea in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 61st most popular in Sweden in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 62nd most popular in Ireland in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Partytown
Styled Components
StyleX
Tailwind CSS🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,580,378 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.