πŸ†š BlazorBootstrap vs. MudBlazor

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

User interface framework
User interface framework

About

BlazorBootstrap is an open-source component library for Blazor built on top of the Bootstrap CSS framework that provides prebuilt UI elements for .NET web applications.

It offers an enterprise-class suite of components such as accordions, modals, grids, charts, form inputs, sidebars and PDF viewers, and supports both Blazor Server and WebAssembly with NuGet installation and CLI templates.

MudBlazor is an open-source Blazor component library based on Material Design principles that provides developers with reusable UI elements for building modern web applications in C#.

It includes a comprehensive set of responsive components such as tables, dialogs, forms, navigation elements, and grids, supports both Blazor Server and WebAssembly, and offers built-in theming and customization with minimal JavaScript dependency.

Headquarters

Hyderabad, India
Γ–rebro, Sweden

Website

Pricing

Free βœ”οΈOpen source
Free βœ”οΈOpen source

Categories

UI Frameworks β€Ί Rank #61
UI Frameworks β€Ί Rank #54

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The MudBlazor UI framework is 6 times more popular than BlazorBootstrap.
Total websites

Market share

UI Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

MudBlazor is more popular than BlazorBootstrap in all countries.
United States
France
Russia
Netherlands
Germany
India
Italy
Iran
South Africa
Denmark

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Internet Services
Blogs/Wiki
Business
Public Information
Education/Reference
Motor Vehicles
Politics/Opinion
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#1,391,107
#3,496,560
#3,969,615
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#34,285
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.