🆚 Blocs vs. RapidWeaver
- 📈 RapidWeaver is five times more popular than Blocs.
- 🌎 RapidWeaver is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Blocs is more popular in Singapore, Russia, and Argentina.
Blocs
RapidWeaverType
About
Blocs is a visual website builder for macOS, iPadOS, and iOS that enables users to create responsive websites and 
WordPress themes without writing code.
It features a visual editor based on 
Bootstrap 5, prebuilt templates, reusable sections, advanced styling and animation controls, e-commerce integrations, 
HTML export, and developer APIs for add-ons.
RapidWeaver is a macOS website builder that enables users to visually create responsive websites without writing code.
It includes more than 50 built-in themes, automatic website navigation management, a built-in 
FTP publisher, SEO health checks, code injection, and supports the 
Stacks plugin ecosystem, which adds drag-and-drop page layouts and hundreds of third-party content components for extending website functionality.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 11st most popular in the United Kingdom in the Website Builders category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in the United States in the Website Builders category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in the Netherlands in the Website Builders category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in Germany in the Website Builders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Adobe DreamWeaver
Mobirise
Nicepage
EverWeb
Xway🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.