🆚 Bluefish vs. MSHTML
- 📈 MSHTML is much more popular than Bluefish.
- 🌎 MSHTML is more popular in the United States, China, and Germany.
- 🌍 Bluefish is more popular in Hungary, Finland, and Belgium.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
MSHTMLType
HTML editor
HTML editor
About
Bluefish is a powerful editor targeted towards programmers and web developers, with many options to write websites, scripts, and programming code.
MSHTML is an editor based on the MSHTML component of the discontinued Internet Explorer browser.
Headquarters
Netherlands
Redmond, Washington, United States
TridentPricing
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
MSHTML technology is 7 times more popular than Bluefish.
Total websites
Market share
HTML Editors
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
MSHTML is more popular in the United States, China, and Germany, while Bluefish is more popular in Hungary, Finland, and Belgium.
United States
China
Germany
United Kingdom
Japan
Canada
Italy
Russia
Spain
France
Awards
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Germany in the HTML Editors category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in China in the HTML Editors category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Russia in the HTML Editors category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Hong Kong in the HTML Editors category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Canada in the HTML Editors category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United Kingdom in the HTML Editors category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
MSHTML is more popular than Bluefish in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Entertainment
Health
Internet Services
Software/Hardware
Art/Culture/Heritage
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Google Web Designer
Emacs🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.