🆚 Bootstrap Icons vs. Fork Awesome
Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *- 📈 Bootstrap Icons is much more popular than Fork Awesome.
- 🌍 Bootstrap Icons is more popular in all countries.
Bootstrap IconsType
Icon library
Icon library
About
Bootstrap Icons is a free, high-quality, open-source icon library with over 2,000 icons.
Fork Awesome is a suite of 796 pictographic and brand icons that began as a fork of Font Awesome.
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Bootstrap Icons library is 60 times more popular than Fork Awesome.
Total websites
Market share
Icons
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Bootstrap Icons is more popular than Fork Awesome in all countries.
United States
India
France
Germany
Brazil
United Kingdom
Italy
Indonesia
Spain
Turkey
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in India in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Indonesia in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Bangladesh in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Saudi Arabia in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Hong Kong in the Icons category.
- ⬆️ 25th most popular in Germany in the Icons category.
- ⬆️ 29th most popular in France in the Icons category.
- ⬆️ 32nd most popular in the United States in the Icons category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Bootstrap Icons is more popular than Fork Awesome in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Internet Services
General News
Software/Hardware
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Ionicons* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.