🆚 Bower vs. Yarn

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Package manager technology
Package manager technology

About

Bower is a package manager for the web, optimized for front-end assets such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, fonts, and images.

It uses a flat dependency tree, installs packages from Git, tracks dependencies, supports hooks for build tools, and although still maintained, the Bower team recommends using Yarn for new front-end projects.

Yarn is an open-source JavaScript package manager originally developed by Facebook (now Meta), designed as a fast alternative to Npm.

It focuses on speed and stability, featuring parallel installation for faster processing, strict dependency version locking, installation from local cache, and a Plug'n'Play (PnP) architecture to optimize package structure and reduce node modules size.

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Package Managers › Rank #3
Package Managers › Rank #4

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

Bower package manager technology is 226 times more popular than Yarn.
Total websites

Market share

Package Managers

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Bower is more popular than Yarn in all countries.
United States
Italy
Spain
United Kingdom
Germany
Australia
France
India
Netherlands
Canada

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Bower is more popular than Yarn in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Online Shopping
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Health
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#1,158
#5,356
View more ➝
Name
Rank
getyarn.io
#11,665
View more ➝

Compare alternatives

Technologies with similar characteristics.

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.