🆚 Builder.io vs. Enonic
- 📈 Builder.io is five times more popular than Enonic.
- 🌎 Builder.io is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 Enonic is more popular in Norway and Kyrgyzstan.
Builder.io
EnonicType
About
Builder.io is a visual development platform and headless CMS that lets teams create, edit, and publish websites and applications with drag-and-drop editors, integrated with 
React, 
Vue, 
Svelte, 
Qwik, and other frameworks.
It supports importing designs from 
Figma, registering custom components, exposing structured data models, and includes scheduling, versioning, content targeting, and enterprise features such as roles and permissions.
Enonic is a composable content management platform that supports headless, hybrid, and traditional CMS architectures.
It provides a flexible schema system, multi-site and multi-language management, role-based access control, content versioning and workflows, starter kits for React and 
Next.js, 
GraphQL and REST APIs, and an integrated AI assistant called Juke that helps create, edit, and translate content.
Headquarters
Pricing
(Visual IDE)
(500 Agent Credits)$30/user/month
(Visual CMS)
(500 Agent Credits)$49/user/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 20th most popular in Australia in the Website Builders category.
- ⬆️ 26th most popular in the United States in the Website Builders category.
- ⬆️ 34th most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 36th most popular in Germany in the Website Builders category.
- ⬆️ 37th most popular in Australia in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Norway in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Sanity
Storyblok
Prismic
Brightspot
CoreMedia🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.