🆚 Bulma vs. Semantic UI

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

User interface framework
User interface framework

About

Bulma is an open-source modular CSS framework based on Flexbox.

It offers a fully responsive 12-column grid system, UI components, themes, color palettes, skeleton loaders, built-in helpers for spacing and typography, and supports customization through Sass variables.

Semantic UI is an open-source component framework that helps create responsive layouts using human-friendly CSS class names.

It provides over 50 UI components, more than 3,000 theming variables, built-in animations, form validation, and integration with frameworks such as React, Angular, Meteor, and Ember.

Headquarters

London, United Kingdom
New York, United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

UI Frameworks › Rank #7
UI Frameworks › Rank #20

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Bulma UI framework is 8 times more popular than Semantic UI.
Total websites

Market share

UI Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Bulma is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom, while Semantic UI is more popular in Latvia, Tanzania, and Ethiopia.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Japan
France
Vietnam
Netherlands
Australia
Spain
Brazil

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Bulma is more popular than Semantic UI in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Software/Hardware
Travel
Health
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#426
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#3,314
#4,872
#7,032
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.