🆚 Bulma vs. UIKit

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

User interface framework
User interface framework

About

Bulma is an open-source modular CSS framework based on Flexbox.

It offers a fully responsive 12-column grid system, UI components, themes, color palettes, skeleton loaders, built-in helpers for spacing and typography, and supports customization through Sass variables.

UIkit is a lightweight and modular front-end framework.

It includes more than 30 reusable components such as modals, tooltips, accordions, navigation menus and sliders, a responsive fluid grid, and supports theme customization via Sass or Less.

Headquarters

London, United Kingdom
Hamburg, Germany

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

UI Frameworks › Rank #7
UI Frameworks › Rank #6

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

UIKit technology is 2.1 times more popular than Bulma.
Total websites

Market share

UI Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

UIKit is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom, while Bulma is more popular in Japan, Vietnam, and Singapore.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Italy
France
Spain
Netherlands
Japan
Russia
Australia

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

UIKit is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and education and reference, while Bulma is more commonly used on online shopping, software and hardware, and fashion and beauty sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Online Shopping
Travel
Software/Hardware
Health
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#426
View more ➝
Name
Rank
fapello.com
#389
#1,156
#1,445
#1,888
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.