🆚 Cache Enabler vs. LiteSpeed Cache
- 📈 LiteSpeed Cache is much more popular than Cache Enabler.
- 🌍 LiteSpeed Cache is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
LiteSpeed CacheType
Caching solution
Caching solution
About
WordPress
HTML
LiteSpeed
Drupal
Joomla
Magento
ShopwareHeadquarters
Ermatingen, Switzerland
Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Requires LiteSpeed Web Server or QUIC.cloud CDN
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The LiteSpeed Cache caching solution is 31 times more popular than Cache Enabler.
Total websites
Market share
Caching
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
LiteSpeed Cache is more popular than Cache Enabler in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Brazil
India
Spain
Netherlands
Australia
Poland
France
Canada
Awards
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Germany in the Caching category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in the Czech Republic in the Caching category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Austria in the Caching category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Taiwan in the Caching category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Poland in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Brazil in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in India in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Spain in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Caching category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
LiteSpeed Cache is more popular than Cache Enabler in all market segments.
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Travel
General News
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,823,966 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.