🆚 CacheFly vs. Imperva
- 📈 Imperva is much more popular than CacheFly.
- 🌎 Imperva is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
- 🌍 CacheFly is more popular in Cambodia.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content delivery network
Content delivery network
About
CacheFly is an American content delivery network provider with over 70 points of presence across North America, Europe, Asia, South America, Australia, and Africa.
The Imperva Content Delivery Network brings content caching, load balancing, and failover so your applications and content are securely delivered across the globe.
Headquarters
Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States
San Mateo, California, United States
Pricing
Developer
Free version ✔️Up to 100 GB
Overage$0.05/GB
Business
Up to 10 TB$300/month
Overage$0.03/GB
Enterprise
Up to 100 TB$2,000/month
Overage$0.01/GB
Free version ✔️Free 30 days trial
Pro$59
Business$299
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Imperva CDN is 40 times more popular than CacheFly.
Total websites
Market share
CDN
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Imperva is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan, while CacheFly is more popular in Cambodia.
United States
United Kingdom
Japan
Spain
Australia
France
Canada
Italy
New Zealand
Germany
Awards
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in the United States in the CDN category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Albania in the CDN category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Thailand in the CDN category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Sri Lanka in the CDN category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Spain in the CDN category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Israel in the CDN category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Imperva is more popular than CacheFly in all market segments.
Business
Sports
Finance/Banking
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Health
Travel
Government/Military
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,372,830 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.