🆚 Centron vs. Civo
Centron is much more popular than Civo.- Centron is more popular in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.
Civo is more popular in the United Kingdom.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Cloud service provider
Cloud service provider
About
Centron is a sovereign German cloud provider operating its own data center, offering virtual machines, managed 
Kubernetes, cloud GPU, and 
S3-compatible object storage with BSI C5 Type 1 attestation.
Civo is a sovereign cloud platform providing infrastructure for Kubernetes, virtual machines, and AI/ML workloads with a focus on carbon-neutral and GPU-powered compute.
Headquarters
Hallstadt, Germany
London, United Kingdom
Pricing
Free version ❌Free trial using a 60-day €200 starting credit
€3.11+/month
Free version ❌Free trial for 1 month using a €250 credit
Compute $0.00744+/hour
Categories
Cloud Services › Rank #42
Cloud Services › Rank #85
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Centron cloud service is 24 times more popular than Civo.
Total websites
Market share
Cloud Services
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Centron is more popular in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, while Civo is more popular in the United Kingdom.
Germany
Austria
United Kingdom
Switzerland
Liechtenstein
Czechia
Hungary
Luxembourg
United States
Antigua and Barbuda
Awards
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Germany in the Cloud Services category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Austria in the Cloud Services category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Centron is more popular than Civo in all market segments.
Online Shopping
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Major Global Religions
Sports
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Recreation/Hobbies
Art/Culture/Heritage
Pharmacy
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,046,631 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.