🆚 Ceph vs. Selectel Object Storage
Ceph is noticeably more popular than Selectel Object Storage.- Ceph is more popular in Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
Selectel Object Storage is more popular in Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Cloud storage service
Cloud storage service
About
Ceph is an open-source distributed storage platform that links multiple servers into a single, scalable storage cluster for object, block, and file storage.
It features a scalable architecture, leverages RADOS capabilities including snapshotting, replication, and strong consistency, and supports 
S3 and 
Swift-compatible object APIs.
Headquarters
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Cloud Storages › Rank #9
Cloud Storages › Rank #10
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Ceph cloud storage service is 1.3 times more popular than Selectel Object Storage.
Total websites
Market share
Cloud Storages
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Ceph is more popular in Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom, while Selectel Object Storage is more popular in Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan.
Russia
Germany
United States
United Kingdom
France
India
Belarus
Japan
Brazil
Canada
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Ceph is more popular among sites focused on business, Internet services, and software and hardware, while Selectel Object Storage is more commonly used on marketing and merchandising, general news, and online shopping sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Software/Hardware
Education/Reference
General News
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Travel
Motor Vehicles
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Red Hat company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,046,631 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.