🆚 Chevereto vs. Piwigo
- 📈 Chevereto is as popular as Piwigo.
- 🌍 Chevereto is more popular in China, Russia, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌎 Piwigo is more popular in Germany, France, and the United States.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
PiwigoType
Content management system
Content management system
About
Chevereto is an open-source, self-hosted, multi-user media sharing platform for image and video hosting.
Piwigo is an open-source photo gallery for the web that lets users organize, manage, and share collections of images and other media with albums, tags and customizable access permissions.
It supports unlimited albums and sub-albums, batch uploads and metadata import, geolocation mapping and search, as well as more than 130 themes and around 400 plugins for customization.
Headquarters
Nantes, France
Pricing
Free version ✔️ AGPL-3.0, open source
Pro $59/year
Free ✔️ + $$$ Open source
Cloud
Pro
(10 GB) €348/year
(10 GB) €348/year
Team
(100 GB) €1,188/year
(100 GB) €1,188/year
Enterprise
(250 GB) €2,388/year
(250 GB) €2,388/year
VIP
(1,000 GB) €4,788/year
(1,000 GB) €4,788/year
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Chevereto CMS platform is as popular as Piwigo.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Chevereto is more popular in China, Russia, and the United Kingdom, while Piwigo is more popular in Germany, France, and the United States.
Germany
France
United States
China
Russia
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Thailand
Poland
Czech Republic
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Chevereto is more popular among sites focused on media sharing, Internet services, and marketing and merchandising, while Piwigo is more commonly used on recreation and hobbies sites.
Media Sharing
Internet Services
Marketing/Merchandising
Pornography
Personal Network Storage
Blogs/Wiki
Business
Online Shopping
Recreation/Hobbies
Travel
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Name
Rank
#13,670
#35,318
#47,631
#79,834
#84,390
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.