🆚 CivicLive vs. Government Site Builder
- 📈 Government Site Builder is three times more popular than CivicLive.
- 🌍 Government Site Builder is more popular in Germany.
- 🌎 CivicLive is more popular in the United States and Canada.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
CivicLive is a content management system designed specifically for government websites.
Government Site Builder (GSB) is a content management system designed for the German public sector. Developed by the Federal Information Technology Center.
Headquarters
Bonn, Germany
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Government Site Builder CMS is 2.8 times more popular than CivicLive.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Government Site Builder is more popular in Germany, while CivicLive is more popular in the United States and Canada.
Germany
United States
Canada
U.S. Virgin Islands
Awards
- ⬆️ 111st most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Government Site Builder is more popular among sites focused on government and military, business, and health, while CivicLive is more commonly used on public information sites.
Government/Military
Public Information
Business
Health
Finance/Banking
Marketing/Merchandising
Sports
Job Search
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.