🆚 Classy vs. Interledger Payment Pointer
- 📈 Classy is four times more popular than Interledger Payment Pointer.
- 🌎 Classy is more popular in the United States, Canada, and Israel.
- 🌍 Interledger Payment Pointer is more popular in the United Kingdom, Germany, and France.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Donation tool
Donation tool
About
Classy is a giving platform for nonprofits that enables them to connect with their supporters through online fundraising.
Payment pointer is a persistent identifier on Interledger that allows websites to receive payments from visitors with Web Monetization enabled.
Headquarters
San Diego, California, United States
Pricing
Free version ❌
On request
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Classy donation tool is 4 times more popular than Interledger Payment Pointer.
Total websites
Market share
Donations
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Classy is more popular in the United States, Canada, and Israel, while Interledger Payment Pointer is more popular in the United Kingdom, Germany, and France.
United States
United Kingdom
Canada
Germany
France
Slovenia
Australia
Italy
Netherlands
Denmark
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in the United States in the Donations category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in the United States in the Donations category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Classy is more popular among sites focused on non-profit, advocacy and NGO, education and reference, and health, while Interledger Payment Pointer is more commonly used on blogs and wiki, Internet services, and technical, business forums sites.
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Education/Reference
Health
Business
Religion/Ideology
Marketing/Merchandising
Sports
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Patreon
Ko-fi