🆚 Codeberg vs. SourceHut
- 📈 Codeberg is three times more popular than SourceHut.
- 🌎 Codeberg is more popular in Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 SourceHut is more popular in the Netherlands, Canada, and Albania.
Type
About
Codeberg is a non-profit collaboration platform for hosting and developing free and open-source software projects, built on the 
Forgejo 
Git-based software forge.
It provides Git repository hosting, issue tracking, pull requests, code review, and wikis, and extends these with services such as 
Codeberg Pages for static site hosting, integrated CI/CD through Woodpecker CI and Forgejo Actions, and Weblate-based translation tools.
SourceHut is an independent software development platform that provides Git and Mercurial hosting, mailing lists, patch-based code review, bug tracking, continuous integration, and public project infrastructure for developers.
It follows a distributed, email-driven workflow inspired by traditional 
Unix development practices, offers a command-line-oriented interface with minimal 
JavaScript, supports static website hosting via 
SourceHut Pages, and build automation through build manifests.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Germany in the CI/CD category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Germany in the Code Hosting category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,827,502 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.