🆚 CodeIgniter vs. Slim

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Backend framework
Backend framework

About

CodeIgniter is an open-source PHP full-stack web framework with small footprint, high performance, and minimal configuration setup.

It includes MVC support, clean URL routing, CSRF and XSS protection, helper libraries for database access, email, sessions, file uploading, and extensive documentation.

Slim is an open-source, object-oriented PHP micro framework designed for rapid development of web applications and APIs.

It offers a fast HTTP router, middleware support, PSR-7 and PSR-15 compatibility for HTTP messages and middleware, and integrates with any PSR-11 container for dependency injection.

Headquarters

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Backend Frameworks › Rank #8
Backend Frameworks › Rank #35

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The CodeIgniter backend framework is 72 times more popular than Slim.
Total websites

Market share

Backend Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

CodeIgniter is more popular than Slim in all countries.
India
United States
Indonesia
Turkey
Brazil
Vietnam
United Kingdom
Korea
Japan
Netherlands

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

CodeIgniter is more popular than Slim in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Travel
Entertainment
General News
Blogs/Wiki
Health

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
toomics.com
#2,897
javmost.com
#4,058
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#169,328
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.