🆚 CodeSandbox vs. GitHub Gist

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Code sharing technology
Code sharing technology

About

CodeSandbox is an online code editor that allows developers to create, share, and collaborate on web applications right in the browser.

Gist is a Git-based service provided by GitHub for sharing code snippets with others.

Headquarters

San Francisco, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️Up to 40 hours of monthly VM credits
Pro$12+/month
Builder$170+/month
EnterpriseCustom
Free version ✔️
Team$4/user/month
Enterprise$21/user/month

Categories

Code Sharing › Rank #4
Code Sharing › Rank #3

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

GitHub Gist code sharing technology is 1.2 times more popular than CodeSandbox.
Total websites

Market share

Code Sharing

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

GitHub Gist is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom, while CodeSandbox is more popular in France, Canada, and Italy.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Japan
France
Australia
Canada
Brazil
Italy
Netherlands

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

GitHub Gist is more popular among sites focused on blogs and wiki, Internet services, and technical, business forums, while CodeSandbox is more commonly used on business, marketing and merchandising, and finance and banking sites.
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Business
Technical/Business Forums
Technical Information
Marketing/Merchandising
Software/Hardware
Personal Pages
Finance/Banking
Sports

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#1,027
#13,266
#26,758
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#20,288
#59,982
#75,988
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.