🆚 Composable Storefront for SAP Commerce Cloud vs. Spryker
- 📈 Composable Storefront for SAP Commerce Cloud is twice as popular as Spryker.
- 🌎 Composable Storefront for SAP Commerce Cloud is more popular in the United States, Chile, and Argentina.
- 🌍 Spryker is more popular in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the Czech Republic.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Composable Storefront for SAP Commerce Cloud
SprykerType
E-commerce platform
E-commerce platform
About
SAP Composable Storefront (formerly Spartacus) is a 
JavaScript-based, headless storefront designed for SAP Commerce Cloud and built using 
Angular.
Spryker is a modular, cloud-native platform with a headless CMS that enables scalable, API-driven content management.
Headquarters
Walldorf, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Berlin, Germany
Pricing
Included in the SAP Commerce Cloud license at no extra cost
Free version ❌
Spryker Cloud Commerce OS $900,000/year
Categories
E-Commerce › Rank #197
E-Commerce › Rank #253
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Composable Storefront for SAP Commerce Cloud e-commerce platform is 2 times more popular than Spryker.
Total websites
Market share
E-Commerce
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Composable Storefront for SAP Commerce Cloud is more popular in the United States, Chile, and Argentina, while Spryker is more popular in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the Czech Republic.
Germany
United States
Chile
United Kingdom
Argentina
Australia
Netherlands
Brazil
Sweden
South Africa
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Composable Storefront for SAP Commerce Cloud is more popular among sites focused on business, health, and real estate, while Spryker is more commonly used on online shopping and fashion and beauty sites.
Online Shopping
Business
Health
Real Estate
Fashion/Beauty
Marketing/Merchandising
Forum/Bulletin Boards
Portal Sites
Restaurants
Pharmacy
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.