🆚 Concrete CMS vs. Open Journal Systems
- 📈 Concrete CMS is noticeably more popular than Open Journal Systems.
- 🌎 Concrete CMS is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌎 Open Journal Systems is more popular in Indonesia, Brazil, and Spain.
Concrete CMS
Open Journal SystemsType
About
Concrete CMS is an open-source content management system built with 
PHP and MySQL that combines in-context editing and modular page building.
It provides on-page and WYSIWYG editing, a flexible block and template system, version control, multilingual support, multisite management, built-in SEO, and a marketplace with thousands of add-ons and themes.
Open Journal Systems is an open-source software for managing and publishing peer-reviewed academic journals.
It provides a complete publishing workflow with role-based editorial management, customizable journal websites, section-based submissions, double-blind and open peer review options, and 
ORCID integration.
Headquarters
Pricing
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Japan in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in New Zealand in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Australia in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Canada in the CMS category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Indonesia in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in India in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Brazil in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Ukraine in the CMS category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Canada in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
WordPress
Joomla
Drupal
Contao
SilverStripe
Modern Campus
Terminalfour
Cascade CMS🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.