🆚 Concrete CMS vs. XOOPS

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Content management system
Content management system

About

Concrete CMS is an open-source content management system built with PHP and MySQL that combines in-context editing and modular page building.

It provides on-page and WYSIWYG editing, a flexible block and template system, version control, multilingual support, multisite management, built-in SEO, and a marketplace with thousands of add-ons and themes.

XOOPS (eXtensible Object Oriented Portal System) is an open-source CMS based on PHP and MySQL.

Headquarters

Portland, Oregon, United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

CMS › Rank #17
CMS › Rank #71

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Concrete CMS platform is 8 times more popular than XOOPS.
Total websites

Market share

CMS

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Concrete CMS is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom, while XOOPS is more popular in Taiwan, Brazil, and Vietnam.
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
Germany
Netherlands
Switzerland
Australia
Canada
New Zealand
France

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Concrete CMS is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and education and reference, while XOOPS is more commonly used on blogs and wiki, forum, bulletin boards, and general news sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Health
Internet Services
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Software/Hardware
Travel
Online Shopping
Sports

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#18,585
#22,374
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#11,804
#39,292
#53,391
#59,587
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.