🆚 Condé Nast Copilot vs. Opennemas
- 📈 Opennemas is noticeably more popular than Condé Nast Copilot.
- 🌍 Opennemas is more popular in Spain and Bolivia.
- 🌎 Condé Nast Copilot is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Italy.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Copilot is a proprietary, Node.js-based, headless content management system developed by Condé Nast for its digital publications.
It offers live story and curated content tools, built-in SEO tools, content syndication, a GraphQL API, and HAL, a natural language processing system that identifies people, topics, locations, and news stories, and annotates them with linked resources.
Opennemas is a Spanish CMS for the news publishing industry.
Headquarters
New York, United States
Ourense, Galicia, Spain
Pricing
Free version ✔️
Professional €50/month
Advanced €100/month
Expert €200/month
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Opennemas CMS platform is 1.3 times more popular than Condé Nast Copilot.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Opennemas is more popular in Spain and Bolivia, while Condé Nast Copilot is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Italy.
Spain
United States
United Kingdom
Italy
Germany
Taiwan
Bolivia
United Arab Emirates
China
Russia
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Opennemas is more popular among sites focused on general news and sports, while Condé Nast Copilot is more commonly used on entertainment, fashion and beauty, and blogs and wiki sites.
General News
Entertainment
Fashion/Beauty
Blogs/Wiki
Restaurants
Travel
Sports
Technical/Business Forums
Real Estate
Incidental Nudity
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Opennemas


