🆚 Contao vs. Volcanic
- 📈 Contao is much more popular than Volcanic.
- 🌍 Contao is more popular in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria.
- 🌍 Volcanic is more popular in Australia, Singapore, and the United Arab Emirates.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Contao is an open-source content management system built with PHP,
Symfony, and MySQL.
It offers advanced editing features, a fine-grained permission system, responsive images, a full-text search engine, a flexible form generator, and built-in SEO tools.
Volcanic is a platform and CMS built for recruitment marketers.
Headquarters
Lyss, Switzerland
Loughborough, United Kingdom
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Contao CMS platform is 46 times more popular than Volcanic.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Contao is more popular in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria, while Volcanic is more popular in Australia, Singapore, and the United Arab Emirates.
Germany
Switzerland
Austria
United Kingdom
France
United States
Poland
Italy
Australia
Netherlands
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Austria in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Switzerland in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 40th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Contao is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and travel, while Volcanic is more commonly used on job search sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Travel
Education/Reference
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Health
Internet Services
Job Search
Software/Hardware
Public Information
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.