🆚 Contao vs. Volcanic
- 📈 Contao is much more popular than Volcanic.
- 🌍 Contao is more popular in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.
- 🌍 Volcanic is more popular in Australia, Singapore, and Japan.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
ContaoType
Content management system
Content management system
About
Contao is an open-source content management system built with 
PHP, 
Symfony, and MySQL.
It offers advanced editing features, a fine-grained permission system, responsive images, a full-text search engine, a flexible form generator, and built-in SEO tools.
Volcanic is a platform and CMS built for recruitment marketers.
Headquarters
Lyss, Switzerland
Loughborough, United Kingdom
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Contao CMS platform is 45 times more popular than Volcanic.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Contao is more popular in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, while Volcanic is more popular in Australia, Singapore, and Japan.
Germany
Austria
Switzerland
United Kingdom
France
United States
Poland
Italy
Australia
Greece
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Austria in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Switzerland in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 40th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Contao is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and travel, while Volcanic is more commonly used on job search sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Travel
Education/Reference
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Health
Internet Services
Job Search
Software/Hardware
Entertainment
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Access company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.