🆚 CoreMedia vs. CrafterCMS

Type

Content management system
Content management system

About

CoreMedia Content Cloud is an enterprise-class, API-driven digital experience platform that combines a headless content repository with advanced digital asset management.

It provides a hybrid headless architecture with 150+ prebuilt connectors, real-time omnichannel preview across devices and channels, support for multilingual, multisite, and multi-brand deployments, e-commerce integrations through its Commerce Hub, and an Elastic Social module for managing user-generated content such as comments and reviews.

CrafterCMS is a Java-based open-source headless content management system designed for enterprise-grade websites.

It features an API-first, decoupled architecture with REST and GraphQL support, Git-based content repository with versioning, in-context editing and drag-and-drop authoring tools, built-in search, and extensibility via Groovy and JavaScript.

Headquarters

Hamburg, Germany
McLean, Virginia, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ❌
$20,000+/year
Free version ✔️Crafter Community, open source
Pay Per Use$456+/month
Pay Per Compute$2,200+/month

Categories

CMS › Rank #94
CMS › Rank #236
DAM › Rank #8

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The CoreMedia CMS is 9 times more popular than CrafterCMS.
Total websites

Market share

CMS

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

CoreMedia is more popular in Germany, Austria, and Italy, while CrafterCMS is more popular in South Africa and Canada.
Germany
Austria
Italy
United Kingdom
United States
Poland
Netherlands
Switzerland
Tanzania
South Africa

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

CoreMedia is more popular than CrafterCMS in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Government/Military
Fashion/Beauty
Finance/Banking
Marketing/Merchandising
Software/Hardware
Public Information
Travel
Health

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#2,092
#10,238
#10,955
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#72,661
#78,940
#99,676
View more ➝

See also

🗃️ About This Data